logoalt Hacker News

notyourworklast Friday at 10:45 PM11 repliesview on HN

What is bad about heavy handed regulation to protect citizens?


Replies

felipeeriasyesterday at 12:03 AM

That it is very likely not going to work as advertised, and might even backfire.

The EU AI regulation establishes complex rules and requirements for models trained above 10^25 FLOPS. Mistral is currently the only European company operating at that scale, and they are also asking for a pause before these rules go into effect.

show 1 reply
terminalshortyesterday at 1:44 AM

This is the same entity that has literally ruled that you can be charged with blasphemy for insulting religious figures, so intent to protect citizens is not a motive I ascribe to them.

show 3 replies
rdm_blackholeyesterday at 10:06 AM

The EU is pushing for a backdoor in all major messaging/email providers to "protect the children". But it's for our own good you see? The EU knows best and it wants your data without limits and without probable cause. Everyone is a suspect.

1984 wasn't supposed to be a blueprint.

mensetmanusmanyesterday at 12:50 AM

Will they resort to turning off the Internet to protect citizens?

show 2 replies
hardlianotionlast Friday at 10:54 PM

He also said “ill conceived”

stainablesteelyesterday at 12:31 PM

what's bad about it is when people say "it's to protect citizens" when it's really a political move to control american companies

_zoltan_yesterday at 12:04 AM

it does not protect citizens? the EU shoves down a lot of the member state's throats.

Workaccount2yesterday at 3:15 AM

You end up with anemic industry and heavy dependability on foreign players.

wtcactusyesterday at 10:12 AM

Because it doesn't protect us.

It just creates barriers for internal players, while giving a massive head start for evil outside players.

marginalia_nulast Friday at 10:57 PM

A good example of how this can end up with negative outcomes is the cookie directive, which is how we ended up with cookie consent popovers on every website that does absolutely nothing to prevent tracking and has only amounted to making lives more frustrating in the EU and abroad.

It was a decade too late and written by people who were incredibly out of touch with the actual problem. The GDPR is a bit better, but it's still a far bigger nuisance for regular European citizens than the companies that still largely unhindered track and profile the same.

show 4 replies
CamperBob2yesterday at 12:31 AM

"Even the very wise cannot see all ends." And these people aren't what I'd call "very wise."

Meanwhile, nobody in China gives a flying fuck about regulators in the EU. You probably don't care about what the Chinese are doing now, but believe me, you will if the EU hands the next trillion-Euro market over to them without a fight.

show 1 reply