> "under what operation?"
You could treat the semicolon as an operator, and just like multiplication over matrices, it's only commutative for a subset of the general type.
Right, exactly. It's been said that (>>=) is a programmable semicolon.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21715426
or carrots return/new line For that matter
Right, exactly. It's been said that (>>=) is a programmable semicolon.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21715426