This is the same entity that has literally ruled that you can be charged with blasphemy for insulting religious figures, so intent to protect citizens is not a motive I ascribe to them.
>charged with blasphemy for insulting religious figures
Isn't that the exact definition of "blasphemy"[1]?
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blasphemy
But it IS protecting citizens from blasphemy.
What entity specifically?
>charged with blasphemy for insulting religious figures
Isn't that the exact definition of "blasphemy"[1]?
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blasphemy