logoalt Hacker News

terminalshortyesterday at 1:44 AM3 repliesview on HN

This is the same entity that has literally ruled that you can be charged with blasphemy for insulting religious figures, so intent to protect citizens is not a motive I ascribe to them.


Replies

LostMyWordstoday at 6:31 AM

>charged with blasphemy for insulting religious figures

Isn't that the exact definition of "blasphemy"[1]?

[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blasphemy

show 1 reply
1718627440yesterday at 2:26 PM

But it IS protecting citizens from blasphemy.

computeryesterday at 11:33 AM

What entity specifically?

show 1 reply