> Even for open source models, you can add a license term that requires users of the open source model to take appropriate measures to avoid [...]
You just made the model not open source
An open source cocaine production machine is still an illegal cocaine production machine. The fact that it's open source doesn't matter.
You seem to not have understood that different forms of appliances need to comply with different forms of law. And you being able to call it open source or not doesn't change anything about its legal aspects.
And every law written is a compromise between two opposing parties.
“Source available” then?
Instead of a license term you can put that in your documentation - in fact that is exactly what the code of practice mentions (see my other comment) for open source models.