// In ST there is apparently an infinite energy source running //

Think about a server farm, which rents out cpu time for linux servers. Sure, you have to play for energy, land, and labor. But are you saying that somehow implies that linux would have to be BSD licensed instead of GPL licensed?

I agree, energy, land, and labor are things which we don't have infinite supplies of, and therefore we need some way to ration them and distribute them efficiently. But I don't see what bearing this has on software licensing.

// If a user hostile descision is made //

Yeah, I don't see what this has to do with BSD vs. GPL or any other software license. I mean, Microsoft has been "boiling the water" forever.

// cant imagine this succeeding. Just look at the slowly shrinking market share of BSD. //

So the answer is not releasing things under the GPL? I don't quite follow the argument here, would you care to clarify?