> Not sure how Nix doesn’t win the readability contest
Not sure how you can be serious.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/d600f006643e074c2ef1d7...
buildGoDir() {
local d; local cmd;
cmd="$1"
d="$2"
. $TMPDIR/buildFlagsArray
echo "$d" | grep -q "\(/_\|examples\|Godeps\|testdata\)" && return 0
[ -n "$excludedPackages" ] && echo "$d" | grep -q "$excludedPackages" && return 0
local OUT
if ! OUT="$(go $cmd $buildFlags "''${buildFlagsArray[@]}" -v -p $NIX_BUILD_CORES $d 2>&1)"; then
if ! echo "$OUT" | grep -qE '(no( buildable| non-test)?|build constraints exclude all) Go (source )?files'; then
echo "$OUT" >&2
return 1
fi
fi
if [ -n "$OUT" ]; then
echo "$OUT" >&2
fi
return 0
}
(Do note the Nix escaping on top of the shell horrors.)Nix just comes from a culture of utter utter horrible code. It's my daily driver, but I am holding my nose.
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/94ec9e47030c2a7280503d338f...
std::string rc = fmt(
R"(_nix_shell_clean_tmpdir() { rm -rf %1%; }; )"s +
(keepTmp ?
"trap _nix_shell_clean_tmpdir EXIT; "
"exitHooks+=(_nix_shell_clean_tmpdir); "
"failureHooks+=(_nix_shell_clean_tmpdir); ":
"_nix_shell_clean_tmpdir; ") +
(pure ? "" : "[ -n \"$PS1\" ] && [ -e ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc;") +
"%2%"
"dontAddDisableDepTrack=1;\n"
+ structuredAttrsRC +
"\n[ -e $stdenv/setup ] && source $stdenv/setup; "
"%3%"
"PATH=%4%:\"$PATH\"; "
"SHELL=%5%; "
"set +e; "
R"s([ -n "$PS1" -a -z "$NIX_SHELL_PRESERVE_PROMPT" ] && PS1='\n\[\033[1;32m\][nix-shell:\w]\$\[\033[0m\] '; )s"
"if [ \"$(type -t runHook)\" = function ]; then runHook shellHook; fi; "
"unset NIX_ENFORCE_PURITY; "
"shopt -u nullglob; "
"unset TZ; %6%"
"shopt -s execfail;"
"%7%",
shellEscape(tmpDir),
(pure ? "" : "p=$PATH; "),
(pure ? "" : "PATH=$PATH:$p; unset p; "),
shellEscape(dirOf(*shell)),
shellEscape(*shell),
(getenv("TZ") ? (string("export TZ=") + shellEscape(getenv("TZ")) + "; ") : ""),
envCommand);
I think sshine was saying that the nix *language* is readable. Both of your examples are from the implementation, not the language itself.