This article is poorly written. It’s so desperate to be clever and edgy that it’s hard to get the facts out of it.
ChatGPT isn’t really a solution because the source is both low quality and has questionable motives. Going to any of the other good articles on the subject that have been linked in this comment section is much better.
Don't say "I'm critical of AI", say "I have questionable motives"!
this is the future of human-written articles - they will obligatory be written like this as 99% of article comments on HN these days is “oh, this is AI written.” :)
It's actually written quite well, you just have to understand the underlying financial documents and methodology.
Things that are hard to read because you lack context is not the same as poor writing.
It's well written for its target audience, people who are used to reading financial analyses.