You're completely misinterpreting my comment. The point is we don't know what, if anything, is "inside" of a neutrino, not just due to current technology but ultimately due to uncertainty principles. But we still study it. I'm aware of how we came to study it.

I literally said nothing about "how" we discovered it, I said, "We don't know what's inside a neutrino, and it's really hard to experiment with them, but we kind of know why and how they interact with different things."

It is wild how you would take that and my analogy about drawing a circle on a map with respect to qualia to mean that I said anything which contradicts the history of neutrino research.

I'm going to assume this was just a true misinterpretation and not just another straw man, so with that in mind, do you have a different response?