I was saying the same thing you were, this is the original post:
> If you allow a transformer to keep generating tokens indefinitely this is probably Turing-complete, though nobody actually does that because of the cost.
Either they're equivalent to Turning machines or not. Claiming that practically they aren't because no one runs them long enough defeats the very notion of a Turning machine in the first place.
I'm shocked a post like this that isn't even at the level of an intro to computation class is getting attention.
> Claiming that practically they aren't because no one runs them long enough defeats the very notion of a Turning machine in the first place.
I think this is your own conclusion, which can't be strictly derived from citation.
Here, I am just nit-picking on your nit-picking, I don't think this discussion is productive or intresting.