logoalt Hacker News

dijittoday at 3:46 AM1 replyview on HN

You kid, but you might be onto something.

The majority of users are content with chromebooks, what does that tell you about the requirements of desktop computers today? It tells me that they are just niche professional tools; and professional tools largely suck for UX..

I had an interesting realisation the other day (that's tangentially related): on my iPhone and iPad: I can't access my work emails or chats at all. Yet on my significantly more difficult to secure laptops: no problem.

The mobile platforms have built-in mechanisms for remote attestation. Desktop operating systems do not.

I think as soon as companies realise that an iPad is "good enough" for email/excel/word workers, we'll see an even more precipitous decline of the desktop operating system experience.


Replies

Liftyeetoday at 4:57 AM

Maybe my definition of UX is behind the times, but I think professional tools have great UX for their intended users... Professionals.

Fine grained control, informative error messages, thought out keybinds, all make the system easier to use for experts