A performance issue related to this is more likely a shortcoming in the software experiencing this issue.

The setting in question is the minimum timer resolution. Changing this will only have an impact on applications that depend heavily on that resolution, i.e. it's not some sort of turbo button for general execution speed. In fact according to the docs, a higher resolution can "reduce overall system performance, because the thread scheduler switches tasks more often."

An application whose performance depends on the timer resolution should be setting that resolution itself, using the Win32 API function mentioned in the thread, timeBeginPeriod, which includes the following in its documentation:

> For processes which call this function, Windows uses the lowest value (that is, highest resolution) requested by any process. For processes which have not called this function, Windows does not guarantee a higher resolution than the default system resolution.

> Starting with Windows 11, if a window-owning process becomes fully occluded, minimized, or otherwise invisible or inaudible to the end user, Windows does not guarantee a higher resolution than the default system resolution. See SetProcessInformation for more information on this behavior.

> Setting a higher resolution can improve the accuracy of time-out intervals in wait functions. However, it can also reduce overall system performance, because the thread scheduler switches tasks more often. High resolutions can also prevent the CPU power management system from entering power-saving modes.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/timeapi/...