The abstract says one thing, the title here suggests an entirely different thing. Besides that not-so-subtle editing, I also find the sample size used more than a little bit lower than one that you could draw such a sweeping conclusion from.
I thought that the title drops the lede so I abreviated the second sentence of the abstract:
We find being near coworkers has tradeoffs: proximity increases long-run human capital development at the expense of short-term output.
I thought that the title drops the lede so I abreviated the second sentence of the abstract: