Because they have a product that makes $1bn+ a year that depends on having a good, stable, cross-platform JS runtime.
You're describing Node.js which has existed for the last 15 years
but they are a company that burns billions every year in losses and this seems like a pretty random acquisition.
Bun is the product that depends on providing that good, stable, cross-platform JS runtime and they were already doing a good job. Why would Anthropic's acquisition of them make them better at what they were already doing?
Ok but node is even more stable and mature - compare node api parity in bun and also issue of bun vs node
That doesn’t require or benefit from acquiring Bun. Node continues to exist and serve fine.
I'm still confused. Why not just pour a ton of resources into it since it's open source. I guess dev mindshare? It is a great product