logoalt Hacker News

simonwtoday at 6:27 PM5 repliesview on HN

Because they have a product that makes $1bn+ a year that depends on having a good, stable, cross-platform JS runtime.


Replies

krashidovtoday at 6:31 PM

I'm still confused. Why not just pour a ton of resources into it since it's open source. I guess dev mindshare? It is a great product

show 1 reply
LunaSeatoday at 6:29 PM

You're describing Node.js which has existed for the last 15 years

show 1 reply
altmanaltmantoday at 6:35 PM

but they are a company that burns billions every year in losses and this seems like a pretty random acquisition.

Bun is the product that depends on providing that good, stable, cross-platform JS runtime and they were already doing a good job. Why would Anthropic's acquisition of them make them better at what they were already doing?

show 2 replies
pzotoday at 6:48 PM

Ok but node is even more stable and mature - compare node api parity in bun and also issue of bun vs node

show 1 reply
sneaktoday at 6:33 PM

That doesn’t require or benefit from acquiring Bun. Node continues to exist and serve fine.