logoalt Hacker News

ascorbictoday at 8:29 PM5 repliesview on HN

> An innovative product with no means of significant revenue generation.

OpenAI has annualized revenue of $20bn. That's not Google, but it's not insignificant.


Replies

ethintoday at 8:38 PM

It is insignificant when they're spending more than $115bn to offer their service. And yes, I say "more than," not because I have any inside knowledge but because I'm pretty sure $115bn is a "kind" estimate and the expenditure is probably higher. But either way, they're running at a loss. And for a company like them, that loss is huge. Google could take the loss as could Microsoft or Amazon because they have lots of other revenue sources. OAI does not.

cmiles8today at 8:35 PM

We live in crazy times, but given what they’ve spent and committed to that’s a drop in the bucket relative to what they need to be pulling in. They’re history if they can’t pump up the revenue much much faster.

Given that we’re likely at peak AI hype at the moment they’re not well positioned at all to survive the coming “trough of disillusionment” that happens like clockwork on every hype cycle. Google, by comparison, is very well positioned to weather a coming storm.

show 1 reply
chealdtoday at 8:31 PM

And a $115b burn rate. They're toast if they can't figure out how to stay on top.

show 1 reply
Spooky23today at 8:35 PM

Google is embedding Gemini into Chrome Developer Tools. You can ask for an analysis of individual network calls in your browser by clicking a checkbox. That's just an example of the power of platform. They seem to be better at integration than Microsoft.

OpenAI has this amazing technology and a great app, but the company feels like some sort of financial engineering nightmare.

echelontoday at 8:31 PM

Every F500 CEO told their team "have an AI strategy ASAP".

In a year, when the economy might be in worse shape, they'll ask their team if the AI thing is working out.

What do you think happens to all the enterprise OpenAI contracts at that point? (Especially if the same tech layperson CEOs keep reading Forbes and hearing Scott Galloway dump on OpenAI and call the AI thing a "bubble"?)

show 2 replies