logoalt Hacker News

LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs

684 pointsby hrncodeyesterday at 8:58 AM394 commentsview on HN

https://ibb.co/fYQVfMWp https://ibb.co/MyTNnrGQ


Comments

steveharing1yesterday at 1:57 PM

For sure there is more to what they just show

user070223yesterday at 1:59 PM

Github hogging cpu when js is turned off

fredgrottyesterday at 2:14 PM

LinkedIN, showing why Reactive is such a good idea by refusing to use it....

No joke, app constantly shows stale posts and stories,,almost like their devs do not understand what the limits to MVVM are for state....rookie mistake

show 1 reply
system2yesterday at 7:37 PM

I think it is an accomplishment to bloat a website to a point where the user needs to download 40-100mb per page. Even if I try, I can't find the right JS files to make it that large. How do they even make JS files this big?

gamblor956yesterday at 7:18 PM

As someone pointed out below, the problem is not entirely (or even mostly) LinkedIn. HN, a text-only website, consumes several hundred MB of RAM on his Mac. On Firefox on my Windows computer, each HN tab I have open consumes at least 30 MB of RAM...for pure text...

The bigger problem is that browsers these days are not very resource efficient because the programmers behind them have powerful top-of-the-line computers that hide all the inefficiencies (or at the very least, computers significantly more powerful than what their users use). This is compounded by the web developers of most websites also using similarly powerful computers for their development, which hides all of the inefficiencies in the website code. This leads to the clusterfuck of LinkedIn using up 2.4GB of RAM across two tabs (though on my computer 2 tabs only uses up about 600 MB even after a few minutes of scrolling).

It turns out that focusing on developer productivity to the exclusion of the user experience has huge negative externalities. Who would have known? (Answer: Literally everybody who was a programmer before the developer-first mentality took over tech.)

The solution: make browser and website developers use slower and less powerful computers than their average user/visitor will use. The performance issues would be identified and addressed immediately.

cmiles8yesterday at 2:50 PM

Beyond being useful for a quick check on someone’s career history, LinkedIn is mostly full of grifters pretending to be experts in things while the actual experts never post about the subject on LinkedIn.

delducayesterday at 2:31 PM

LinkedIn is full of crap. Unfortunately is the only way to get recruiters visibility.

arun6582yesterday at 11:53 AM

linkedin is shit. i will get negative karma again

show 3 replies
examachineyesterday at 8:03 PM

what a useless junk indeed.... terrible code

thebeardredisyesterday at 4:54 PM

And? Who uses (is used by) Linkedin?

pugchatyesterday at 2:26 PM

[dead]

6272connectyesterday at 4:49 PM

[dead]

Andrew_McCarronyesterday at 7:22 PM

[dead]

ryguzyesterday at 2:34 PM

[dead]

6272connectyesterday at 12:25 PM

[dead]

LePetitPrinceyesterday at 4:08 PM

[dead]

emiliazaryesterday at 2:36 PM

[dead]

cuevaioyesterday at 6:19 PM

whatttt

dave333yesterday at 12:26 PM

Now I'm retired, linkedin's daily games are a fun way to do a little brain tai chi. Queens https://www.linkedin.com/games/queens/ is my favorite, although my solve time is consistently about twice the average apparently.

show 1 reply
davisryesterday at 2:45 PM

[flagged]

show 2 replies
z3ratul163071yesterday at 3:13 PM

well it is a microslop product, what do you expect?

b8yesterday at 2:40 PM

So I pay for Global Entry only to have to play for Clear for faster screening. Now I have to pay another fee for a different service to get thru it faster AGAIN. I'm tired of the pay to win situation.