Why assume there is a clock, rather than assume the damage is at the metabolic level? None of the predominant forms of human chronic disease that lead to most instances of death today (artherosclerosis, cancer, neurodegenerative disease, metabolic dysfunction like diabetes) seem like an intentional function. They seem like unintended consequences of other functions, like lipid transport or DNA replication, that don’t get selected against because they fall beyond the natural reproductive lifespan of most people. I suppose you could say that the biological clock in question is the number of eggs a woman has, but a simpler explanation for limitation could be that eggs are just very energetically expensive to produce.
Because you can reset the clock, and even sabotage it. In fact, that's how we produce a certain class of medicine (by now probably 10 classes of medicine, but ...)
Also, there Henrietta Lacks, died in 1951 of metastasized adenocarcinoma, but "still alive":
Correct me if I'm mistaken, I was under the impression a human female is born with all the egg she will ever have, so the expensive production bit you're talking about happens during gestation of the human embryo.