I think some of his advantage analyzing where tech can go is because he pushed the limits of it (eg working remotely early early).

He was disappointed in the Apple vision pro for just being an entertainment device (it seems like you two agree there?)

And then the interviews by media of tech should be viewed as an iterated game. He can ask interesting questions for an analyst, but he (and Nilay) do depend on access and that fundamentally constrains what types of questions they can ask if they want continued access

> Just not doing it for me. Think I'm gonna stop reading anything he says.

Pretty sane take tbh