Claude is only available to people over 18 years

Everyone shares their all kinds of data with ai companies. Privacy is dead anyway

No one cares

the same way social networks are not available for < 13

Now I feel better. Just needed to watch this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgmFhjAaWFQ

> May 19, 2026

>You’ll have the option to verify your age using Yoti, a third-party age verification platform.

Thank goodness that there are others on the frontier.

Since May?

DeepSeek is the BEST model for the money. Why people still waste money on Claude is beyond me.

I barely am using my Claude subscription anymore anyhow. If they make me ID for it I'll simply cancel and use an open model.

It's really a head to head race between these two companies. Which one is more disgusting etc?

i get that there is a vocal contingent yelling about kids using AI tools, and frankly I also think things like character.ai are potentially really harmful, but this is like saying you have to be age verified to use google

Think of the children, won't you?

Ah yes, the usual drop down where we need to confirm we are above 18.

Do they even know what it is?

Offbrand LLM - I don’t think they care

Anyone else sick of these Claude articles???

We get it. Anslopic the “me too” company has a “me too” LLM.

Do you have to ram this shit down our throats everyday!???

Fucking hell. Enough of god damn CLAUDE.

Stop the hourly Anslopic ads for fucks sake!!!!

Thanks

Another example of AV doing serious damage to the people it claims to "help". Must be a day ending in 'y'.

Techbros: It's fine to demand ID verification for everything, except voting, because that's racist.

But, it's nice that Anthropic is finally admitting claude is just a casino of code. Keep pulling that one armed bandit, maybe you'll get the right code next time.

The real reason they're doing this is because most minors can't pay lmao

[flagged]

[dead]

[dead]

[flagged]

[dead]

Great to see the AI ecosystem finally mature /s

[dead]

[flagged]

Anthropic is incredibly good at avoiding all the useless AI risks, while not doing anything serious about the real risks (that is: uncontrolled growth). I'm as pro-AI as I think that eventually it will remove suffering from humans, and will allow us to prosper more and help us with tons of problems we created. However the problem is not job loss or minors using AI (minors are fucked because of cell phones and social networks), the problem is avoiding extinction. For this position I was accused of AI psychosis multiple times, but I'm in good company (Hinton, for instance), so I bet some comment that trivializes this issue will surely reply to this one, but at this point it is important to see what everyone really believes. Anthropic only touches the surface of AI security, consistently.