It can't be 28% for the whole state, that would mean a third of the population are degenerate gamblers.
No. Say 100 / 100 000 people are degenerate gambleurs at risk of bankruptcy. +28% would mean 128 are now at risk.
> can't be 28% for the whole state, that would mean a third of the population are degenerate gamblers
Not how likelihoods work.
No. Say 100 / 100 000 people are degenerate gambleurs at risk of bankruptcy. +28% would mean 128 are now at risk.