alt Hacker NewsI'm with you in the first sentence, but the second doesn't make sense to me.
All 4 combinations of (not-)solved-by-tech and (not-)caused-by-tech are possible.
I'm with you in the first sentence, but the second doesn't make sense to me.
All 4 combinations of (not-)solved-by-tech and (not-)caused-by-tech are possible.
Can you give a concrete example of caused by technology, but not solvable (in principle if that was what you meant) by technology? I am having trouble coming up with one.