logoalt Hacker News

pdpi10/01/20242 repliesview on HN

Which brings us to: It's unclear why the author of the article decided that the reviewer was not acting in good faith.


Replies

jeroenhd10/01/2024

The reviewer asserts that the addon transmits data. It does not.

That may not be malice, of course. It could just be incompetence (someone running an automated scanner and not verifying that the results are correct), someone trusted with a job they're not capable of doing, or maybe it's just Mozilla pretending someone reviewed the addon while using shitty AI like ChatGPT to do all the work.

The email even directly links to resources that are supposedly "minified, concatenated or otherwise machine-generated". That's simply not true.

busterarm10/01/2024

Maybe it's the fact that 80+% of Mozilla's revenue comes directly from payment by Google who are extremely hostile to ad blockers (and UBO in particular) at the moment.

That should be obvious, honestly. The extension is a threat to the reviewer's paycheck...

show 1 reply