logoalt Hacker News

ysofunny10/01/20244 repliesview on HN

IP is an obsolete idea of a bygone century

it arose from a legitimate answer to material scarcity, but it's nonesense in the digital space

people who advocate for IP and DRM and all such thing are in the end advocating for scarcity.


Replies

Wytwwww10/01/2024

So your position is that almost nobody who sells their content should be able to make a living doing that?

You either must be able to fund it through ads, host it on platform which make piracy effectively impossible and/or impractical like Apple's App Store, YouTube etc. or be independently wealthy and just do it as a hobby?

e.g. screw all the authors who are writing books, Amazon should just be able to distribute (or sell for some "convenience" fee) books to everyone who has a Kindle without paying anything to them? That (which would be the logical outcome of nothing having no IP protection) certainly sounds like a reasonable opinion..

show 4 replies
MaxBarraclough10/01/2024

What do you say to people who want to stop using Open Source software licences and instead use 'Fair Source' licences intended to prevent cloud companies monetising the works of others?

For instance, here's discussion about a blog post titled So you want to compete with or replace open source https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40993787

With no copyright, it would be akin to using permissive BSD-style licensing, which is by no means everyone's preference.

show 1 reply
snapcaster10/01/2024

I don't agree with them, but i haven't seen the argument being pro scarcity. To steelman it, the argument is that without these protections the incentive to create is lower so we actually will have more scarcity

show 1 reply