logoalt Hacker News

freejazz10/01/20243 repliesview on HN

> I think you could argue that NO recording this old should still be under copyright

In a court of law? Not seriously nor credibly. The term of a copyright is provided for by statute.


Replies

EarlKing10/01/2024

Pretty sure he's talking about the way things should be, not the way things are. The way things should be: None of this would be a problem. The way things are: Brewster Kahle is jeopardizing the archive's mission with his cavalier attitude towards copyright that is causing the archive to lose lawsuit after lawsuit. While fighting bad law is certainly a good thing, maybe imperiling the archive in the process is not. Unfortunately, such nuanced takes seem to be lost on people who treat these issues as a form of team sports and demand you either be simply pro- or anti-.

show 2 replies
oneplane10/01/2024

On the other hand, we constructed the court of law to help society, not the other way around. Same goes for statutes.

show 1 reply
axus10/01/2024

An American would have to argue this while running for office, and then argue it in Congress. Alternatively, get a position to exploit the "copyright exception" provisions.

show 2 replies