logoalt Hacker News

shrubble10/01/20243 repliesview on HN

Solaris' strength was handling jobs under memory pressure and still working, in a way that 2007 Linux would not; however RAM was dropping in price at the time and this wasn't much of a concern as a result, for desktops at least.


Replies

throw0101d10/02/2024

> Solaris' strength was handling jobs under memory pressure and still working […]

And under high load.

I've had Linux live lock on more than one occasion when load averages hit >100. I've never a Solaris (or FreeBSD) system live lock even under ridiculous loads (200+), and was always been able to login and kill whatever process(es) went sideways.

show 2 replies
gorfian_robot10/02/2024

one time we had something going ... wrong. took forever to login and the first person on entered 'uptime' and the load average was in the thousands. nothing was failing. just taking a really really long time to complete.

Gibbon110/02/2024

That's what I remember my sys admin friends saying. The Sun machines could handle heavy loads without falling over. But if you were running a heavy single user application or compiling a big project a commodity wintel box was faster.

show 1 reply