logoalt Hacker News

bee_rider10/02/20241 replyview on HN

It is a little different now, in the 90’s there was so much low hanging fruit that new-thing could be multiple times better than old-thing. Arm might get a durable lead of, ya know, a couple or a dozen percentage points over x86. It isn’t like a quantitative difference so huge that it becomes a qualitative one.

In the 90’s, after all, aliens were coming to Earth to steal Intel’s chips.


Replies

nullindividual10/02/2024

Arm64 (M3) lags behind in some single core benchmarks vs Intel's high end desktop CPUs and is abysmal in multi-core benchmarks due to the limited number of cores, at least according to https://www.cpu-monkey.com.

Granted, the Intel CPU at the high end is pulling 250W+ (or was it 300W+?).

There are places for both architectures. I don't see x86 going anywhere unless Intel folds and ceases to design chips. Not sure AMD could power on alone given their current market share, though I certainly hope they could as a user of their chips in the desktop (and conversely, an M2 Air for my laptop).

show 2 replies