OP is close to defending sovereign citizens.
Well-regulated, established organizations are not threats to liberty; on the contrary, they’re required for a well functioning community (of netizens)
Some kings thought that they were bound to gods so in the name of total freedom they announced themselves as “god-kings”
I'm 33 and this is an argument I haven't considered, or have heard worded in such a way. Thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought the next few days.
It's not an either-or. Organizations are required for a well-functioning community, but they're also threats to liberty insofar as they represent easily capturable concentrations of power.