[flagged]
I do actually see the reason. Not sure if you've had real human interactions before, but I'm pretty sure that forcing behaviours on people are usually not going to give you a good result (unless it's a "the writer's barely disguised fetish" situation), I've read what the comments of the repository said and found no evidence of extortion, impersonation or anything. Also, not sure why did you immediately assume the users could be minors?. By the way I'm not judging you, just my personal opinions of what the fudge is happening (else you would need to also censor me if i said fuck instead of fudge, this ain't the TVGuardian your parent might have used when you were little).
> These same individuals have made comments that range from violating the code of conduct of an open project to falsifying information, impersonation, and even extortion
What the actual fuck.
If someone is doing ACTUAL crimes like that you report them to the real authorities. And not open a GitHub Issue.
But we know they’re not actually doing those things are anything like it. They have four letter words in their code and you’re insane.
You just opened this account, either fake or you’re an actual SCANOSS employee, to try to damage control against your boss’s goofy scanner that embarrassed him.
quiquetdl There’s no point in trying to challenge those who think that knowing how to use ChatGPT makes them programmers, and that using Google and social media makes them feel like Columbo. (If you had to Google who Columbo is, you’re probably one of them.) I’ve been a lawyer for 30 years and have spent the last 20 years leading an OSPO in an organization with 210 employees. I believe SCANOSS may have made a minor mistake with its automated reporting, which could potentially go against GitHub’s rules. While the goal of the 'experiment' is completely valid, the method may not be. However, under no circumstances does this justify filling a collaborative repository (with no relevant connection) with insults and excessive aggression.
> Quique Goñi: I’m joining this discussion because within my organization, we use the purl2cpe repository daily. To leave a comment, you need to create an account, as I just did. The account creation process is far too simple and lacks proper authentication measures, meaning anyone could easily impersonate someone else."
> These same individuals have made comments that range from violating the code of conduct of an open project to falsifying information, impersonation, and even extortion
What the actual fuck.
If someone is doing ACTUAL crimes like that you report them to the real authorities. And not open a GitHub Issue.
But we know they’re not actually doing those things are anything like it. They have four letter words in their code and you’re insane.
Account created today, using the username "quiquetdl". Google that user name. Only other account is "Quique Goñi (quiquetdl)" on Pinterest. Google ""Quique" Goñi ScanOSS"
Oh, [email protected] exists. HM. I wonder if maybe you might have some bias in this?
What CoC did we violate, by the way? You're the ones who came into my repo with a bot and used a bot to tell me not to swear. Which, again, is a violation of GH TOS.
I have not falsified information, impersonated anyone, or extorted anyone. If I have, I welcome you to show it. Make a blog post, post it here, whatever.
Hell, sue me. I've emailed you guys with my personal email a few times and offered to call on Zoom or with phone.
As for "or their guardians" I'm an adult, though given you're pretending not be associated with your employer I'm questioning if anyone at ScanOSS is.