Aw, I take that as it is in fact a for-profit company already.
Regardless, I wish you luck for the future! May you not go down the almost inevitable enshittification hole.
It’s a company limited by guarantee, which is the structure you use in the UK for non-charity non-profits.
If it started that way, I'd say it's less likely to end up "bad". Compared to non-profit websites that get sold to ad businesses.
At least it is a private company though, meaning they are are required to make constant year over year gains for shareholders and investors. They have much more control over where the company goes and how it operates.