logoalt Hacker News

rqtwteye10/11/202413 repliesview on HN

It's a pretty sad thought that everybody will be on a drug that keeps weight in check while most people will still eat a basically toxic diet. Weight is certainly an important factor but there is more to a healthy life.


Replies

intothemild10/11/2024

I've been on wegovy for almost two years now, and I can attest to how much you just DONT want to eat junk anymore. It's one of the most commonly talked about things we discuss with other users over the last few years. That and lower want to drink, and gaining back so much of energy/time due to not having to think about food every 3 seconds of the day.

I'm super satisfied just having an apple or two now. The "omg I need to eat, ohh a burger" is gone.

show 1 reply
kelseyfrog10/11/2024

From my understanding GLP-1 agonists can actually modulate the reward pathway reducing people's appetite for toxic diets.

We're not socially caught up yet to this information. I suspect there are folks who believe that regardless of similar outcome (reduction of toxic diet), that changing diet without medication is superior to those who change their behavior through pharmacological intervention. It's like the pre-1990s view on depression or anxiety - chemical intervention is a moral weakness.

show 3 replies
asib10/11/2024

Sure, but the "unhealthy but not excessively caloric" diet is not a problem ozempic attempts to address. As far as I understand, it simply limits your appetite. Potentially one can go on ozempic, lose weight, and still end up eating unhealthily, because the resulting diet is made up of nutritionally poor foods.

show 3 replies
Karrot_Kream10/11/2024

There's a decent amount of evidence that the most toxic thing about modern diets is their amounts: calorie counts and such. Many things (sugars, ultra-processed foods (ugh I hate the NOVA classification), fat, etc) are fine in moderation. The dose makes the poison.

habitue10/11/2024

Seems like just an orthogonal problem? If calorie input is solved, now all the moralizing and shaming can be about nutrition instead

show 1 reply
Fernicia10/11/2024

Is it fundamentally any different from something like toothpaste?

Humans have created a technology (mechanised farming) with a side effect we haven't yet evolved to handle (an abundance of tasty calories), so it doesn't seem all that strange we would fix it with a technology (inhibiting the desire for said calories).

snarf2110/11/2024

Serious question: Why not make toxic diet illegal or cost prohibitive? Lots of manufactured food is designed to be more addictive. Then add in constant advertising bombardment targeted at kids. Why is there up to double the sugar in US bread and soda versus Europe?

show 1 reply
dr_dshiv10/11/2024

It’s not clear to me that this is the case.

People in the Netherlands eat such shit food — but they are so healthy because they move a lot and aren’t obese.

I’m not sure that food quality is as important as we sometimes hope it is (after all, we pay for quality)

lostmsu10/11/2024

I think your statement is very funny. If the drug keeps weight in check on a toxic diet and that has the same outcome as "healthy life", then is that "healthy life" any more healthy then the drug+junkfood combo? Also, what is sad about it?

petesergeant10/11/2024

> while most people will still eat a basically toxic diet

It's a pretty sadder fact that people just make these wild assertions. Everyone I know (which is about 10 people in real life, myself included) who's used a GLP-1 drug found that they eat healthier because they've less desire for shittier food.

cyberax10/11/2024

> basically toxic diet

This is a bullshit term. Even fast food is not "toxic", it's just calorie-dense.

I got overweight eating nothing but "healthy" diet because I have never _liked_ fast food.

outworlder10/11/2024

> while most people will still eat a basically toxic diet.

Had to scroll too far to find this. It's a great synergy isn't it? The food industry creates calorie concoctions that can barely be called food, are dirt cheap to make and rakes in profits. People get sick. The pharmaceutical industry sells drugs are stupid high profit margins so that people can keep on living.

It is not a conspiracy, but it's a good feedback loop for corporations. All that money allow them to flood the scientific community with their sponsored studies, dominate news broadcasts (confusing consumers) and even influence the food pyramid, which is almost upside down.

I've been on a slow quest to improve health and lose weight. It's really, really slow, far slower than what most people would like. But cutting added sugars to zero (including and most especially high fructose corn syrup) gave almost immediate benefits that kept me going. Sugars (and carbs in general) make you retain a lot of water. Cut those, and you'll see a major difference in the scale in a couple of weeks. Is it mostly water(but not entirely!) Yes. It doesn't matter, our lizard brains interpret that as success. That also reduces hunger, which is a positive feedback loop.