> enough of these people
There’s more than enough already. (And, historically, you only need less than a dozen.)
> (And, historically, you only need less than a dozen.)
This seems initially like a pretty outlandish claim to me. Could you clarify what you're referring to here?
alt Hacker News
> (And, historically, you only need less than a dozen.)
This seems initially like a pretty outlandish claim to me. Could you clarify what you're referring to here?