> Also, those bombs saved a lot of lives. I know many will disagree, but it's true.
This is a hotly, perhaps one of the most hotly contended, modern questions of World War II. To say what you said so blithely betrays your ignorance on the subject.
General modern consensus suggests that the first is up for debate for various reasons, but that the second one really didn't do much to change the Japanese government's course.
Regardless if you disagree with that above statement or not, positioning your uninformed opinion as fact is a bad look.
[flagged]
A specific strain of 20th century revisionism considers their use questionable in academia, it isn’t remotely a consensus (outside JP) and it certainly isn’t modern.