> AI isn't the problem, we are.

I see major problems with the statement above. First, it is a false dichotomy. That’s a fatal flaw.

Second, it is not specific enough to guide action. Pretend I agree with the claim. How would it inform better/worse choices? I don’t see how you operationalize it!

Third, I don’t even think it is useful as a rough conceptual guide; it doesn’t “carve reality at the joints” so to speak.