If someone has a broken leg, the word "crutch" isn't derogatory in the first place.
Cessation tools are not negative. Yes, root causes of abuse should be addressed, but aids are aids.
The negative connotation of a crutch implies that you are past the point of needing it and should be standing on your own two feet. If a thing is not meant to be temporary, or if you'll never be able to perform a task as well without it as you could with it, then it's a tool rather than a crutch.
Thus, calling GLP-1 meds a “crutch” implies that they are unnecessary, and that the patient should be able to do it without medication, which then creates guilt and shame where there shouldn’t be any.
> If someone has a broken leg, the word "crutch" isn't derogatory in the first place.
It is so profoundly disingenuous to pretend not to know what the word "crutch" means or what connotations it has in this context. Like, come on.