logoalt Hacker News

MichaelZuo10/12/20241 replyview on HN

They were pretty much the only game in town, other than IBM and smaller mainframe vendors, if you wanted actual written, binding, guarantees of performance with penalty clauses. (e.g. with real consequences for system failure, such as being credited back X millions of dollars after Y failure)

At least from what I heard pre-HP acquisition, so it’s not ‘amazing lock in’, just that, if you didn’t want a mainframe and needed such guarantees, there was literally no other choice.


Replies

lazide10/12/2024

Notably, that is amazing lock in. What else would it look like?

show 1 reply