logoalt Hacker News

perihelions11/07/20242 repliesview on HN

That doesn't really work because marine life is good at filtering and concentrating a subset of the elements that are in spent nuclear fuel. There are already ocean fish that are too poisonous too safely eat because of (coal-emitted) mercury pollution—and that's only 100,000 tons of mercury, total, in the history of human industry [0]. If you dig in to the hard numbers surrounding spent fuel, it's a much, much more toxic and difficult problem than mercury—diluting it in the oceans is a complete non-starter.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_mercury_pollution


Replies

meindnoch11/07/2024

Mercury from burning coal is an extremely dilute pollutant. There's zero hope for capturing and containing it. Nuclear waste in contrast is literally just barrels/boxes of stuff. You can pick it up with a forklift and put it inside a sealed container for the next thousand years.

show 1 reply
LargoLasskhyfv11/08/2024

s/ocean/subduction zone/

aka the solution to pollution is magmatic delusion err... dilution.