logoalt Hacker News

sitzkrieg11/07/20246 repliesview on HN

rt linux is not appropriate for many hard realtime requirements

i have seen some try and fail in an effort to save $perceived_value


Replies

jonaias11/08/2024

RT Linux is not the only alternative. There are now plenty of options for achieving hard real-time performance without relying on proprietary RTOS solutions:

  Dedicated Real-Time Cores: Many SoCs include dedicated cores specifically for hard real-time tasks.
  Microcontroller Companions: Pairing a microcontroller running a lightweight RTOS with a larger, general-purpose processor as a supervisor (You can use normal Linux).
  FPGAs: Custom FPGA implementations can deliver deterministic timing where ultra-low latency or specialized processing is needed.
And ofc, RT Linux, that in my experience is suitable for over 80% of hard real-time applications (an estimation, based on experience as a former user—your mileage may vary).
show 1 reply
eikenberry11/07/2024

Is there a good libre real-time OS you would recommend over it?

show 3 replies
RandomThoughts311/07/2024

Agree but I have seen more people wrongly think they need hard real time than people incorrectly picking their kernel.

xcrunner52911/07/2024

I don’t doubt this but it’s worth noting that I believe spacex uses Linux as their RTOS.

show 1 reply
worthless-trash11/08/2024

talk nerdy to me, which ones ?

gerdesj11/08/2024

[flagged]