None of them are owned by the creator of Codebuff. Why not create something to replace or be at the same level as those? Also, who is "we"? I don't use or like none of these.

Codebuff is the easiest to use of all these, because you just chat, and it finds all the right files to edit. There's no clicking and you don't have to confirm edits.

It is also a true agent. It can run terminal commands to aid the request. For one request it could: 1. Write a unit test 2. Run the test 3. Edit code to fix the error 4. Run it again and see it pass

If you try out Codebuff, I think you'll see why it's unique!

one size does not fit them all, and such tools are quite straightforward to develop. I even created one myself: https://npmjs.com/genaicode, I started with CLI tool, but eventually learned that such UX is not good (even interactive CLI), and I created a web UI.

where the problems start: cost of inference vs quality, latency, multi modality (vision + imagen), ai service provider issues (morning hours in US time zones = poor quality results)

the best part is being able to adjust it to my work style

We also have ed, the standard Unix text editor.

A tool like this is probably a great way to get some VC money.

first time?