logoalt Hacker News

nradov11/20/20245 repliesview on HN

Yes, this is why having a prompt satellite launch capability to replace attrition losses is now a strategic imperative. We need to be able to put up new ones in a matter of hours, not months.


Replies

littlecranky6711/20/2024

Why is that? Undersea cables makes way more sense - the issue is we have maritime law that allows any nation state to freely roam over important cables. During wartimes this is a complete different story - ships won't be allowed near the lines, and if they do get close they will be destoryed without prior warning. No more anchoring "accidents".

show 5 replies
Gud11/20/2024

If someone starts blowing up satellites it’s pretty much game over for space based communications.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome

show 4 replies
dylan60411/20/2024

You can have the ability to launch 100 satellites in 10 days, but that doesn't really help if you don't have 100 satellites

show 1 reply
PaulDavisThe1st11/20/2024

"we" are not doing anything AFAICT. Various privately owned corporations might be, and that's very different.

Yes, I know the undersea cables are privately owned too.

show 1 reply
1oooqooq11/20/2024

weren't those cut exactly because they are the starlink backbone when over Ukraine?