So if a university has money, learning there should be free?
If you don't have guns, you won't have gun violence, but I guess the second amendment won't be changed any time soon.
> So if a university has money, learning there should be free?
Not an unreasonable proposition. The purpose of the university is ostensibly to provide an education, not to continue hoarding more and more money.
For a private school, they can choose how to spend their money. Hoarding it is one option.
For the federal government, they can choose how they allocate grants. Withholding grants from greedy schools is one option.