logoalt Hacker News

try_the_basslast Thursday at 12:35 AM6 repliesview on HN

> which is totally unfair, every niantic player should have access to all the stuff because they collectively made it

I don't understand this perspective. While all players may have collectively made this model possible, no individual player could make a model like it based on their contributions alone.

Since no single player could replicate this outcome based on only their data, does it not imply that there's value created from collecting (and incentivizing collection of) the data, and subsequently processing it to create something?

It actually seems more unfair to demand the collective result for yourself, when your own individual input is itself insufficient to have created it in the first place.

I don't think producers of data are inherently entitled to all products produced from said data.

Is a farmer entitled to the entirety of your work output because you ate a vegetable grown on their farm?


Replies

jzblast Thursday at 12:50 AM

“Is a farmer entitled to the entirety of your work output because you ate a vegetable grown on their farm?”

Bad analogy. I pay a farmer (directly or indirectly) for the vegetable. It’s a simple, understood, transaction. These players were generally unaware that they were gathering data for Niantic in this way.

If data is crowdsourced it should belong to the crowd.

show 1 reply
PittleyDunkinlast Thursday at 1:42 AM

> I don't understand this perspective. While all players may have collectively made this model possible, no individual player could make a model like it based on their contributions alone.

I don't think this is very difficult to sort out: people feel entitled to the products of their labor.

> Is a farmer entitled to the entirety of your work output because you ate a vegetable grown on their farm?

This is comparing apples and oranges: presumably the consumer didn't do anything to produce the vegetable. Hell if anything, under this analogy niantic would owe users a portion of their profits.

show 3 replies
kortillalast Thursday at 2:12 AM

Most of your analysis is flawed because the model is non-rivalrous so it could easily be given to every player.

Additionally, many people can contribute to make something greater that benefits everyone (see open source). So the argument of “you couldn’t have done this on your own” also doesn’t hold any water.

The only thing that protects niantic is just a shitty ToS like the rest of the games that nobody pays attention to. There is nothing fundamentally “right” about what they did.

show 1 reply
Larrikinlast Thursday at 6:00 AM

People who think like this and want to profit off you with KPIs is why players should always maliciously comply with data grabs. Spend the 30 seconds activating the accelerometer and doing sweeps of your shoes and full finger covers of the surroundings to get those poffins and rare candies. It's gross that lately they want to give me 10 pokeballs now instead.

show 1 reply
IsopropylMalbeclast Thursday at 12:49 AM

What you say is fair but if an individual's data doesn't matter, what happens when they ask to have their data deleted under GDPR. is there a way to demux their data from existing models?

show 2 replies
Dylan16807last Thursday at 4:08 AM

> Is a farmer entitled to the entirety of your work output because you ate a vegetable grown on their farm?

This is more like paying the farmhands.

If we're looking at my work output, eh, everyone that works on a copyrighted thing gets a personal license to it? That sounds like it would work out okay.

> I don't think producers of data are inherently entitled to all products produced from said data.

It depends on how directly the data is tied to the output. This seems pretty direct.