You can spin this both ways. So if I include a 12,000 page EULA with my product, you're the idiot if page 8,172 includes a footnote that allows me to sell your data, but uses terms defined a few thousand pages earlier, so you actually have to read all of it?
You can play these shenanigans with businesses, but I for one am happy such behaviour is illegal here when selling to consumers.
Don’t use product with EULA you refuse to read. Then people will stop including them. Especially when it’s a game.
Anyway I’m all for outlawing the inclusion of predatory clauses in EULA but this is not one of this case.
People just want to have their cake and eat it to.