You keep referencing Eugene Parker?
This guy? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Parker
You seem to be a religious fanatic. I didn't respond before because it seemed like just lunatic ravings.
You seem to argue against any natural order, against science, that 'nature' is ordered by the grace of god.
But then you quote a physicist?
What is the deal? How do you square this? It seems like someone that has read a lot of pop-science, and then use scientific terms to form some world description about how god is doing it all.??
[flagged]
> What is the deal? How do you square this?
Loving God means appreciating, at least to some extent, God's wonderful design of this mathematical universe, its mystery and grandeur, and the scientific structures of nature, which includes ourselves, and so much more.
I am not "Frustrated" my friend, and I'm not a "Monkey"; I'm a human being with a body whose body plan is based upon the mammals, specifically the primates, but with important differences. And I am happy because I understand how to live life and have done a fair job at living it.
I am open-minded and open-hearted and love you and everyone I encounter, and this is the result of decisions I have made and practices I have performed. And I share this with you all in love and respect and service, but it's only my responsibility to lead you to the water. I cannot make you drink, so my duty ends there, where also ends my concern.
What I am saying to you is that you cannot understand my perspective until you enter the Path of Love. I offer you this out of no desire for myself, only for your happiness and the happiness of those around you.
There's a reason you can not provide one cogent argument to any of my detailed responses to you, and Occam's Razor suggests why, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with me. Dunning-Kruger is instructive, my friend, very instructive, indeed.
We love you.