logoalt Hacker News

richardw12/08/20243 repliesview on HN

It’s a fair assumption because there’s no genetic benefit to being a smart plant. Why would nature make that?

Opposable thumbs mean we have the ability to use smarts, so genetics walked the path to consciousness over many generations. A smarter horse is fine and all but not that beneficial. Being faster or stronger or sexier is probably better. Same with a plant: get more nutrients or sunlight. There are cheaper ways than being smart to do that.


Replies

tripper_2712/08/2024

Define "smart". And explain how "smart"=="conscious"

I can agree that there is no genetic benefit to being able to move at the speed animals move, because that's not how plants obtain food or avoid being eaten. Thus no need for nerves or a CNS to coordinate movement.

show 1 reply
quonn12/08/2024

Right, but intelligence/smarts and consciousness are not the same.

show 1 reply
techas12/08/2024

It is not clear if there is a evolutionary benefit for human to be conscious. Although here we are…