Okay, I originally didn't respond, but your comment got upvoted out of gray so I'll put in the effort.
Your claim of "No, it wouldn't" is simply wrong. They said "since 1.2" and you can't just ignore that when you're citing a 1.1 problem. The disclaimer that you edited in gets at a relevant point but it's not strong enough to make your claim actually be true.
And the winky face and the "hint" just make things worse, since they knew exactly what you meant.
Okay, I originally didn't respond, but your comment got upvoted out of gray so I'll put in the effort.
Your claim of "No, it wouldn't" is simply wrong. They said "since 1.2" and you can't just ignore that when you're citing a 1.1 problem. The disclaimer that you edited in gets at a relevant point but it's not strong enough to make your claim actually be true.
And the winky face and the "hint" just make things worse, since they knew exactly what you meant.