alt Hacker NewsAnd that is fine reasoning, the workaround is not for me… but the larger issue is an inventor kneecapping something by stating how you should use it.
It’s not like there isn’t another side to this argument.
And that is fine reasoning, the workaround is not for me… but the larger issue is an inventor kneecapping something by stating how you should use it.
It’s not like there isn’t another side to this argument.
> the larger issue is an inventor kneecapping something by stating how you should use it
This isn't kneecapping something any more than an inventor requiring programmers in a new language use types, or not use types, whichever the inventor deems preferable.
He invented a thing. He declared how the thing is constructed. That's not kneecapping. That's just defining a thing.