It's actually a good analogy. It doesn't mention "timbre" and doesn't claim that timpre is not part of the compositional process. A classical composer can indeed specify timbre to a certain degree, and modern composers created new kinds of scores which offered more specification means for many features related to "timbre", but there is still a difference between composing music, playing music or building instruments in formal musical education.
No you're simply wrong. This is how a "classical Western" musician thinks of music, but this is not necessarily what music is. Timbre is the main expressive content in many cultures.
Check my comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=gnulinux#42368137