Academically, no, a type system is by definition static. See the definition Benjamin Pierce gives in TAPL that I've placed in many comments in this subthread [0] and won't repeat here.

Colloquially, yes, python has a type system. All I'm saying is it's unhelpful to correct someone for using the more correct definition rather than the colloquial one. Both definitions are valid, but if we're going to be pedantic we should at least use the academic definition for our pedantry.

And you're correct, I should have said spectrum, but the point is still the same: even Wikipedia refuses to define "strongly" or "weakly" typed, suggesting people use terminology that isn't hopelessly muddled.

[0] Here's one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42368689