alt Hacker News> They may not match exactly what the writer had in mind, but they are fit for purpose.
That's what GenAI is doing, too. After all, the audience only sees the final product; they never get know what the writer had in mind.
> They may not match exactly what the writer had in mind, but they are fit for purpose.
That's what GenAI is doing, too. After all, the audience only sees the final product; they never get know what the writer had in mind.
I haven't used SORA, but none of the GenAI I'm aware of could produce a competent comic book. When a human artist draws a character in a house in panel 1, they'll draw the same house in panel 2, not a procedurally generated different house for each image.
If a 60 year old grizzled detective is introduced in page 1, a human artist will draw the same grizzled detective in page 2, 3 and so on, not procedurally generate a new grizzled detective each time.