alt Hacker News> If it's not a negative, you should have no problem doing so, right?
Faulty logic - it can be bad for specific individuals while being a net good for society at large.
NOTE: I am not the OG claimant, I'm not supporting their argument - I'm merely pointing out your rebuttal is weak (to the point of not working at all).
>Faulty logic - it can be bad for specific individuals while being a net good for society at large.
How is every person living in fear that they can be identified, stalked, subjected to abuse or even killed just because some rando doesn't like what they said on some internet forum a "net good for society at large"?
Please do explain.
As for my "rebuttal" being weak, I merely called for GP to have the courage of their convictions. And since (based on their participation in this discussions) they apparently have neither, I thought I'd point that up.
Don't like my writing style? Note my username and feel free to ignore me.