> How is every person living in fear that they can be identified, stalked, subjected to abuse or even killed just because some rando doesn't like what they said on some internet forum a "net good for society at large"?

That has nothing to do with your argument above re: one specific person being weak to the point of nonexistent - you've gone off on a tangent.

> Please do explain.

It's self evident to those with a background in formal debate, mathematical logic, general reasoning, etc. If you honestly can't see that and are interested in improving your comment skills in a technical forum such as HN then you may want to look into that.

> I merely called for GP to have the courage of their convictions.

Their claim that Doxxing might be a net good has little to do with it being bad for individuals doxxed, nor even being bad for every individual actually doxxed.

"Net good" and metrics for good|bad are the concepts you'd need to firm up and address here.

> Don't like my writing style?

It's the unsubstantive rhetoric in the guise of reason I addressed - that done I suspect we're done.

Perhaps with practice you'll do better in future than lurking about sniping at week old comments secure in the knowledge they likely won't even see your fluff.